Michigan Senate Debate: El-Sayed Calls SAVE Act ‘Voter Suppression’
Michigan Senate candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed criticizes SAVE Act as voter suppression during debate with Mike Rogers.
2 min read
During the final Michigan U.S. Senate debate on Wednesday, Muslim leftist candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed rejected proposals requiring proof of citizenship and voter ID for elections, calling GOP-led efforts to secure U.S. elections ‘about voter suppression.’ The debate, held at WXYZ-TV’s studio in Detroit, focused on key issues surrounding the SAVE America Act, which would mandate showing valid ID to prove citizenship before voting in federal elections.
El-Sayed Condemns SAVE Act as Voter Suppression
El-Sayed, who is running against Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), was asked about his stance on the SAVE Act during the debate. He responded by labeling the legislation as ‘about voter suppression,’ arguing that it would place unnecessary burdens on voters, particularly women who have changed their names.
‘Let’s be clear, this is about voter suppression,’ El-Sayed said. ‘The SAVE Act would require women who changed their names to go back and find their birth certificates just to be able to vote in our election. I mean, I think that’s pretty crazy, and you pile that on to the voter suppression tactics we’ve seen out of the Supreme Court, backed by Donald Trump, backed by Mike Rogers,’ he added.
El-Sayed also criticized the outcomes of the last election, emphasizing that people have fought and died for the right to vote. He stated, ‘I, for one, believe in democracy and will abide by the outcomes of this election. He’s questioned the outcomes of the last election in the first place.’
Rogers Defends SAVE Act as Rational and Necessary
Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers, El-Sayed’s opponent, dismissed his claims, calling the SAVE Act ‘very reasonable and rational.’ Rogers accused El-Sayed of prioritizing illegal immigrants over taxpaying American citizens and argued that requiring proof of citizenship and ID to vote is essential for building confidence in elections.
‘So, my opponent, again, calls for open borders, wants to give illegals driver’s licenses and then avail them to all of the services of the United States of America. And by the way, it’s easy to work your way into a system: show an ID to vote. I think is absolutely imperative. It won’t do anything — it builds confidence in our elections, which is what you want,’ Rogers responded.
The debate highlighted the growing divide over election security and voter access, with both candidates presenting contrasting visions for the future of voting in the United States.
Source: Breitbart
