Alaska Senate Scandal: Decoy Candidate’s Home Investigated

0

Independent journalist investigates decoy candidate’s home in Alaska amid fraud allegations.

The image shows a political campaign sign for Dan S. Sullivan for U.S. Senate alongside a scene of a reporter interviewing two individuals at a doorstep.

3 min read

Independent journalist Nick Sortor recently traveled to the remote neighborhood of Decoy Daniel J. Sullivan in Alaska, where he conducted an investigation into the fake Senate candidate’s home amid allegations of election fraud. Sullivan, who was placed on the ballot to confuse voters, is currently under criminal investigation by the Justice Department, which has issued over 40 subpoenas as part of the probe.

Sullivan was recruited to run against incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan by a Democrat staffer tasked with finding potential candidates for the ballot. The plan reportedly involved a mysterious Midwestern operative who used a fake name and pitched to would-be candidates at local brew pubs. Sullivan was found in a tiny fishing village along the Alaska Panhandle, accessible only by air.

Sortor spent several hours over two days staking out Sullivan’s home, but found no signs of movement. He released footage of himself exploring the area, knocking on the main house and an apparent guest house, and even found a rope, which he described as a noose.

Sortor then visited Sullivan’s neighbor to ask if they had seen him. The neighbor revealed that Sullivan is not a Republican, stating, “He’s been a Democrat his entire life. Every election we drive by there, and he’s always been a Bernie Sanders or a, you know, Kamala Harris supporter, and so for him to call himself a Republican, obviously,” said the man, identified as Mr. Meeks. His wife added, “it’s questionable.”

The neighbor also noted that they didn’t know their Senator’s middle initial was S until the decoy Dan debacle. They had to pencil in “Dan S.” on their yard sign to distinguish between the two candidates, calling the situation “confusing and deceptive.” The man questioned whether the Democrats would pay Sullivan’s court fees if he ended up in court, suggesting, “that’s where the useful idiot comes in.”

Several neighbors were seen with signs in their yards, with “Dan S.” penciled in to overcome confusion at the polls. Even Sullivan’s own home had a sign placed out front by his neighbors with “Dan S.” written on it.

The incident has raised concerns about election integrity and the potential for fraud in the 2022 midterm elections. As the Justice Department continues its investigation, the case highlights the risks of deceptive political strategies and the importance of transparency in electoral processes.

Source: The Gateway Pundit

Written by
Connor Davis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *