Newsom Signs Order to Use ‘Artificial Intelligence’ Amid AI Naming Debate
California Governor Gavin Newsom signs executive order to use ‘Artificial Intelligence’ as federal government adopts ‘Super Intelligence’ terminology.
2 min read
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed an executive order requiring state agencies to use the term ‘Artificial Intelligence’ in all official communications, marking a direct response to President Donald Trump’s recent push to rename the technology as ‘Super Intelligence.’
State vs. Federal Terminology
Newsom’s order mandates that all California agencies and departments under his authority refer to the technology as ‘Artificial Intelligence,’ ‘AI,’ or ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI).’ This decision comes after Trump issued an executive order declaring the start of the ‘Era of Super Intelligence,’ directing federal agencies to use the term ‘Super Intelligence’ and ‘SI’ instead of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ and ‘AI’ in non-statutory documents.
Newsom’s office criticized Trump’s approach, stating, ‘Super intelligence is clearly not coming from the White House — that’s why California continues to lead.’ The governor emphasized that California remains committed to leading in AI regulation and innovation, while the federal government lacks a unified strategy.
California’s AI Regulations
In addition to the terminology directive, Newsom announced a series of new AI regulations aimed at protecting workers and families. The policies cover employment, workplace surveillance, deepfakes, and other AI-related uses. Newsom stated, ‘AI should expand opportunity — not come at the expense of workers and families.’ He highlighted California’s commitment to placing people at the center of technological advancement.
Newsom also criticized the Trump administration for the absence of federal leadership in AI regulation. While Trump’s order applies only to the federal executive branch, it does not require states or private companies to adopt the ‘Super Intelligence’ terminology. This highlights the ongoing divide between state and federal approaches to AI governance.
As the debate over AI terminology continues, California’s decision underscores the broader implications of naming conventions in shaping public perception and policy. The state remains a key player in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence regulation and innovation.
Source: The Gateway Pundit
