Law Firms Tie to China Climate Campaigns Amid Energy Litigation
Major U.S. law firms are linked to a climate advocacy group tied to China, raising national security concerns.
2 min read
Major U.S. law firms are increasingly entangled with a climate advocacy group that is accused of undermining American energy independence and advancing Chinese interests. The Environmental Law Institute (ELI), a nonprofit organization, is at the center of this controversy, as it is believed to be fostering a climate lawfare campaign that targets American energy companies while strengthening ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Law Firms and Climate Lawfare
According to a recent report by China watchdog State Armor, the largest and most prestigious law firms in the U.S. are actively funding and coordinating with ELI to launch climate-related legal actions against their own energy clients. These firms, including WilmerHale, Arnold & Porter, and Latham & Watkins, are not only donating to ELI but also providing personnel and strategic support to its climate advocacy efforts.
These law firms are also defending energy companies in climate lawsuits, which raises questions about their dual role. For example, Arnold & Porter represents BP in over 30 climate change lawsuits, while Latham & Watkins and WilmerHale have defended other energy defendants in similar cases. Former Arizona Supreme Court Justice Andrew Gould has highlighted the potential conflict of interest, warning that energy clients may be compromising their legal representation by retaining firms with close ties to ELI.
Strengthening Chinese Influence
ELI’s collaboration with BigLaw firms extends beyond legal strategy. It is alleged that these firms are helping the CCP gain strategic insights into U.S. environmental regulations and the energy industry. In one instance, ELI and Latham lawyers established a working group that briefs the Chinese government on American environmental practices, enabling Beijing to exploit this information for economic and geopolitical advantage.
This is described as a classic “gray zone” intelligence operation, where American NGOs are used to advance Chinese interests. The report suggests that China is using this information to pressure American businesses and policymakers, while also gaining legitimacy through its ties to Western legal institutions.
Implications for U.S. Energy and National Security
ELI’s connections with China and its role in promoting climate lawsuits have raised concerns about national security. Law firms involved in this network are accused of prioritizing Chinese interests over American energy clients. The report also highlights the potential for these firms to benefit from their access to emerging Chinese regulatory markets, with some maintaining offices in China for decades.
Chad R. Mizelle, a former U.S. Department of Homeland Security official, has called for law firms to distance themselves from ELI, suggesting that this is a necessary first step in addressing the broader issue of Chinese influence in American legal and policy spaces.
Source: Daily Wire
