Texas Universities Move to Restructure ‘Studies’ Programs
Texas universities are eliminating ‘Studies’ programs amid claims of ideological bias and activism.
2 min read
Several Texas universities are rethinking their approach to so-called ‘Studies’ programs, which include disciplines like African American Studies, Gender and Sexuality Studies, and Asian American Studies. These programs, often seen as deeply ideological and activist-oriented, are being restructured or eliminated, sparking debate over their academic value and purpose.
Program Restructuring and Eliminations
The University of Texas at Austin recently removed Women and Gender Studies courses from its core curriculum, following earlier consolidation of similar departments. UT San Antonio and Texas A&M have also made changes, with the latter closing its Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies program. Texas Tech University and Texas A&M’s Board of Regents have implemented system-level restrictions on ‘race or gender ideology.’ These actions reflect a broader trend across Texas higher education institutions.
Academic Ideology and Activism
These ‘Studies’ disciplines are often characterized by their activist commitments and ideological leanings, which some argue create tension with traditional academic norms. For instance, the National Women’s Studies Association emphasizes ‘feminist education and change,’ aiming for a world free from sexism and racism. Similarly, the Association for Asian American Studies highlights advocacy alongside scholarly work. In contrast, disciplines like Political Science and Psychology maintain a more traditional focus on knowledge pursuit, even if they are not without their own biases.
Systemic Changes and Governance Reforms
Texas has taken a systemic approach to restructuring academic programs, with the passage of SB-37 in 2025 reducing faculty senates to advisory roles and shifting curriculum and hiring authority to governor-appointed regents. This reform has empowered institutions like UT Austin to revise academic programs. Similar changes have been made by Texas Tech University System’s chancellor and Texas A&M’s Board of Regents.
Public Interest and Academic Integrity
Proponents of these reforms argue that public universities should prioritize the public interest, as determined by elected officials, rather than activist employees with personal agendas. State-level reforms like those in Texas are seen as a way to preserve academic and institutional integrity while aligning with broader societal values.
Broader Implications and Future Trends
These changes are not unique to Texas. Florida, for example, took similar steps with its 2023 governance law, which led to the elimination of New College’s Gender Studies program. Other states like Maryland and Georgia have also dissolved similar departments, though often citing declining enrollment rather than political pressure. The question remains: which states will lead the next phase of higher education reform?
Source: Daily Wire
