DSA Candidate Defends Display of Cop-Killer Portraits in Her Bookstore
Florida Senate candidate Angie Nixon defends her cafe’s display of controversial ‘civil rights leaders’ including Assata Shakur.
2 min read
Angie Nixon, a Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member and Democrat candidate for Florida’s U.S. Senate seat, has defended her decision to display portraits of figures like Assata Shakur, a Marxist cop killer, in her Jacksonville-based bookstore and café, ‘Cafe Resistance.’ Nixon claims the space serves as a safe haven for political organizing and learning about history, particularly Black history that she says is often sanitized or misrepresented.
Defending ‘Civil Rights Leaders’
Nixon opened ‘Cafe Resistance’ in 2024, stating that freedoms were under attack and that there were ‘no places for us to be safely.’ She accused her opponent, Sen. Ashley Moody (R), of sending a ‘heckler’ to her establishment during a press conference, where the individual criticized her for displaying portraits of individuals she referred to as ‘civil rights leaders.’ These figures, including Assata Shakur, were convicted for violent acts, such as killing police officers, according to Nixon.
Historical Context and Ignorance
Nixon admitted her bookstore is not profitable, and she has invested her own money to keep it operational. She emphasized that the space is for learning history, particularly the ‘messy’ and ‘ugly’ parts, including the stories of those who fought against oppression, even if they faced legal consequences. She claimed she is ‘pleading ignorance’ about whether some of these individuals were ‘set up’ by the system.
Quotes and Campaign Rhetoric
During a campaign event, Nixon quoted Assata Shakur, who was once listed as a ‘Most Wanted Terrorist’ by the FBI. She used her platform to highlight what she called ‘freedom fighters,’ emphasizing the importance of teaching history that includes resistance and struggle, even if it involves controversial figures.
Political and Historical Controversy
Nixon’s defense of the portraits has sparked debate about the portrayal of historical figures and the role of public spaces in political discourse. Her stance reflects broader tensions within the Democratic Party and the DSA over how history is taught and who is considered a ‘civil rights leader.’ The controversy highlights the intersection of politics, activism, and historical interpretation in modern American society.
Source: Breitbart
