Ken Jennings Backs Tax Reform in Washington State
Jeopardy! host Ken Jennings supports initiative to repeal millionaire’s tax in Washington.
2 min read
Ken Jennings, the iconic Jeopardy! host and record-setting champion, has joined the NO on 645 coalition in Washington State, supporting efforts to repeal the state’s 9.9% “millionaires tax” on income over $1 million. The initiative, known as Initiative 645, has sparked controversy as it seeks to eliminate a tax that applies to approximately 25,000 of the wealthiest residents in the state, enacted in 2026.
Support for Tax Reform
Jennings, who has been a prominent figure in popular culture for years, has used his platform to voice concerns over the potential impact of the tax cut. In a 30-second ad, he warned that the measure would provide a $13 billion tax break to the wealthy, exacerbating the existing imbalance in Washington’s tax system. He emphasized that working families already pay twice as much in taxes compared to the wealthiest residents, and that Initiative 645 would make this disparity even worse.
Jennings also highlighted the broader implications of the tax change, including potential cuts to public schools and other essential services. He noted that teachers, nurses, and small businesses have all expressed opposition to the initiative, reinforcing the argument that the measure is fundamentally flawed. His message was clear: “It doesn’t take a quiz show host to know that 645 is wrong for Washington.”
Political Implications
According to NW Progressive, Jennings resides in Seattle and was born in Snohomish County, a key swing county in Washington State. The county, home to the third-largest voter bloc in the state, plays a critical role in determining the outcome of the initiative. If Snohomish County votes against the measure, it would align with its neighbor, King County, which is expected to vote down 645, potentially leading to its defeat.
Snohomish County, while historically leaning Democratic, has shown support for right-wing ballot measures in the past. This makes it a crucial battleground for both sides of the political spectrum. The county’s mixed voting patterns underscore its significance in the broader context of the election and the state’s political landscape.
Source: Breitbart